• howler@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is hilarious. The biggest inconvenience this will cause, is people asking “can you post a screenshot? I dont use Twitter.”

    • grahamsz@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      It is kind of a disaster for emergencies. Twitter is the defacto social network whenever any disaster strikes round here, the sheer volume of people, emergency services and the versatility of hashtags make it great for that.

    • nodester@partizle.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      They’re trying to juice up their stats for advertisers. More registered users = more surveillance capitalism.

  • comicallycluttered@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    Lol. “Town Square”. Hah.

    Honestly, thank you, Elon. Now I’m not even tempted to visit that toxic hellscape echo chamber of awful shit.

    Bastard somehow did something that’ll probably have a more positive effect on my mental health.

    This is a net positive (for me), but it’s still fucking dumb, and his fault. “Too many sites were scraping us :(” Yeah, dude, that’s what happens when you pull the “API is only for the wealthy now” nonsense.

    I swear, this could be prescient, actually. Could easily see Huffman pulling this shit within the next few weeks. (Lol, I wouldn’t put it past him to do it tomorrow.)

    The advertisers must love this.

  • Cat@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    These social media giants seem to be self destructing themselves on purpose.

    • kmkz_ninja@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Seriously though, what is causing all of these various media platforms to ramp up the attacks on their users so obviously? Reddit blocking apps, Twitter login-hiding posts, Google shutting down adblockers. Is it coordinated? Does it just make sense to make a rush for money when every company is doing the same?

  • Qiz@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Will this affect Google search? That’s got to be a good driver for Twitter right?

    Maybe trying to get people that end up there after a search to sign up would be a better tactic.

  • Kuroneko@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Welp, this kills Twitter for me permanently. I closed my account after Mush took it over but sometimes I’d check out tweets and replies my Discord friends would share. Big tech just keeps shooting itself in the foot lately.

  • Disgustoid@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    That’s certainly one way to begin a social media detox along with Reddit’s idiocy over third party apps. This will make it much easier to ignore Twitter since I deleted my account there and have no intention of signing up again just to view tweets.

  • bermuda@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I mean it kind of already was, right? You could view specific tweets and a couple replies before a banner showed up asking you to sign in and preventing you from scrolling further. It did the same thing if you tried to click on certain things. I had a firefox extension to bypass it which worked wonders. I assume there’ll probably be a new one for this.

  • esaru@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Twitter users can’t post to the general public anymore. Their posts are visible to users logged into Twitter only. That should render Twitter useless to whoever wants to post something to people on the Internet. I wonder what journalists, companies, or politicians think about it.

  • rm_dash_r_star@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’ve never used Twitter, but on occasion been linked to something there. So if that’s intentional they’re killing off that kind of traffic on purpose. It seems all these corpo social media sites are monetizing themselves to death.

  • African_Grey@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Mastodon is better anyway. I deleted Twitter ages ago when Musk took over. It’s amazing how many people have stayed there despite how much he’s shit all over the userbase. He makes Spez look like a saint.

    • Kaldo@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Mastodon might be “better” but it’s in a completely different league if it’s missing 99% people I actually care about following on twitter. On mastodon the feed is just random people talking about their personal stuff and misusing hashtags, and usually when you bring this up the answer is “well duh, mastodon is not supposed to be twitter, it is its own thing”.

      • kippidashira@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Agreed. There’s a lot mixed messaging from the userbase where we’re recommended to switch to Mastodon from Twitter but also respect that Mastodon is not supposed to be a Twitter replacement.

  • Elbrond@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Well, that makes it even easier to never visit Twitter again. Right now I was sometimes tempted to follow a link and see what it was about, but I’ll be happy to quit that habbit too.